Consumer Choice in the 1920s: Women, Local Merchants and the Development of Retail Chain Stores
Marcus L. Miller
Summer 2009
|
|
The period from 1900 to 1930 saw major transitions in the
Overview/ Materials/Historical
Background/LOC Resources/Standards/ Procedures/Evaluation/Rubric/Handouts/Extension
|
Objectives |
Students will: · Use primary sources to explore the changes in purchasing habits and retail changes during 1900–1930 · Examine historical photographs · Identify changing consumer trends during 1900–1930 · Identify the impact of these changes on towns and cities · Compare and contrast trends from 1900–1930 with those they are experiencing today · Understand the role new consumer products played in changing American society · Understand that economics and personal choice have historical consequences
|
|
Recommended time frame |
1 to 2 periods |
|
Grade level |
9–11 |
|
Curriculum fit |
|
|
Panoramic
photographs – see Resource table
(either use copies or have the ability to project onto a screen) Photograph
analysis worksheet – print enough for each student or group http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/worksheets/photo.html (for a revised photograph analysis sheet see the resource table) Buying Habits of Small-Town Women worksheet Copies of letters from the Crawford Men’s Business League, A.B. DNault for Safeway Stores, and from H.C. Hansbrough to Senator Gerald Nye. |
|
|
|
· Standard 1 Chronological thinking. A: Distinguish between past, present, and future time. · Era 6, Standard 1 · Study how the rise of corporations, heavy industry, and mechanized farming transformed the American people. · Era 7, Standard 3 · 3B Students will examine the changes in the modern corporation including labor policies and the advent of mass advertising and sales techniques. · Analyze the new business downtowns, development of suburbs, and the role of transportation in changing urban and rural life.
|
|
|
Day One: ·
Divide
students into groups of 3–4. Show students the panoramic photos of ·
·
and ·
Have
students fill out the photograph analysis sheets. After completing this activity, ask which
location they would go to if they were going shopping – for clothes,
appliances, or groceries. Which
location would have the best selection?
Which location would offer the best prices? The best service? Why would people from Falls City, Nebraska,
and Hiawatha, Kansas, travel to Kansas City, Missouri to shop? How might these purchases affect their
hometowns in the short-term? In the
long-term? ·
(These
towns were chosen because they correspond to the survey The Buying Habits of Small-Town Women. The towns were within a 150-mile radius
of ·
Ask
students how they make decisions about where to purchase items. On what do they base their decision? How do these decisions impact their town or
city? Is the impact on their local
community a factor in their choice? If
not, should it be? Are there factors more important than price when deciding
where to buy? ·
Optional
Activity: Use Google Maps to find street views for
·
Hand
out excerpts of The Buying Habits of
Small-Town Women: A Survey, 1926, or direct students to the
website at http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/amrlg.lg06 ·
Have
students complete the worksheet. ·
Direct
students to The Menace of the Chains,
1924. Use either paper copies or the website at http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/amrlg.lg34 Review with students what a chain store is. Have the students develop two lists, one explaining the benefits of chain stores and the other explaining the drawbacks of chain stores according to the author. Day Two: ·
Direct students to The present status and future prospects of chains of department stores,
1927 by Edward A. Filene. http://memory.loc.gov/gc/amrlg/lg24/lg240001.gif (or give them a copy of the first page – see attachments). How does the author view chain stores? ·
Give
students copies of letters from the Crawford Men’s Business League, A.B. DNault for Safeway Stores, and from H.C. Hansbrough to Senator Gerald Nye. See resource table for copies. ·
Have
students identify which documents favor chain stores and which oppose
them. Have students identify,
summarize, and list the arguments made for and against chain stores. ·
Have
students write a response to Filene from the perspective of one of the three
letters to Senator Nye. |
|
|
Evaluation will include participation in the group activities and completion of the resource sheets as well as their written responses. |
|
|
·
Have students find information regarding the
expansion of Walmart or other large retail chains,
or the impact of Internet sales on “traditional” retail stores. Students may find it interesting to compare
the arguments for and against Walmart with the
arguments made in the 1920s in relationship to chain stores. ·
Have students survey the number of retail
establishments which have closed or opened in their town within the past five
to ten years. This may be particularly
appropriate in smaller towns. ·
For teacher background material see Stone,
Kenneth E., Georgeanne Artz,
and Albert Myles, “The Economic Impact of Walmart
Supercenters on Existing Businesses in Mississippi, http://www.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/stone/MSsupercenterstudy.pdf accessed 08/08/2009, and Norm Taylor,
“Impact of Walmart on Downtowns,” http://www.emich.edu/public/geo/557book/c313.impactwalmart.html accessed 08/08/2009, and the website for
the New Rules Project: A Program of the Institute for local Self-Reliance
http://www.newrules.org/retail/key-studies-walmart-and-bigbox-retail |
|
|
|
At the turn of the 20th
century, new industrial processes had transformed the manufacturing process in
With the building of better roads, mail-order catalogs, and the development of chain stores, consumers found they did not need to rely on local merchants. Local merchants could no longer count on distance from larger towns or cities to protect their business. The 1920s are often depicted as a time when the economy was booming. For some it was, but many small-town merchants faced increasing economic pressure as consumers demanded better service, prices, and choices. Faced with a loss of business, some merchants and small towns joined together to pressure Congress to pass laws limiting the operation of chain stores.
The Buying Habits of Small-Town Women published in 1926 examined why women chose to make purchases in their small town, through a mail-order catalog, or in a larger nearby city. The survey provides an interesting view of why women made the choices they did, and in addition provides a fascinating look at the many new consumer items becoming available to people.
I live in a small town where the last twenty years has seen two new auto dealerships, a lumberyard, gas station, pharmacy, hardware store, and even the town bar close. The information in this lesson reminds us that similar issues were faced throughout the last century. The choices we make today as consumers are not much different than those made one hundred years ago. By working through this material, students can hopefully understand something of how our economic choices impact our local communities. If they use the extension materials, they should realize that the arguments to buy local are nothing new and are often ineffective in the face of consumer demand for lower prices.
Primary
Resources from the Library of Congress
|
Image |
Description |
Citation |
URL |
|
|
|
DIGITAL ID: (digital file from intermediary roll film copy) pan 6a05310 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pan.6a05310 Panoramic photographs (Library of Congress) Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division |
http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/pan/6a05000/6a05300/6a05310r.jpg |
|
|
Panoramic photo, c1908 |
Digital ID: pan 6a07475 Source:
digital file from intermediary roll film copy |
http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/pan/6a07000/6a07400/6a07475r.jpg |
|
|
10th and Panoramic photo, c 1909 |
Digital ID: pan 6a07238 Source: digital file
from intermediary roll film copy |
http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/pan/6a07000/6a07200/6a07238r.jpg |
|
|
Panoramic photograph, c1907 |
Digital ID: pan 6a04465 Source: digital
file from intermediary roll film copy |
http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/pan/6a04000/6a04400/6a04465r.jpg |
|
|
Panoramic photo c1907 |
Digital ID: pan 6a04505 Source:
digital file from intermediary roll film copy |
http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/pan/6a04000/6a04500/6a04505r.jpg |
|
|
“The Buying Habits of Small-Town Women,”
a survey compiled and analyzed by Mary E. Hoffman, director of research,
Ferry-Hanly advertising company. 1926 |
CALL NUMBER DIGITAL ID Prosperity and
Thrift: The Coolidge Era and the Consumer Economy, 1921-1929 |
|
|
|
“The Menace of the Chains,” a discussion of chain store distribution and its serious menace to the manufacturer, whose business success depends on his finding and keeping a market for his product. |
CALL NUMBER DIGITAL ID CREATED/PUBLISHED Prosperity and
Thrift: The Coolidge Era and the Consumer Economy, 1921-1929 |
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/amrlg.lg34 |
|
|
“The Present
Status and Future Prospects of Chains of Department Stores,” by Edward A. Filene
— an address delivered before the American Economic Association, |
CALL NUMBER DIGITAL ID Prosperity and
Thrift: The Coolidge Era and the Consumer Economy, 1921-1929 |
|
|
|
Letter from A.B. DNault, Safeway
Stores to Senator Gerald Nye, |
Folder: Chain Banks and Chain Stores Senator Gerald Nye Papers |
|
|
|
Letter from Crawford Men’s Business League to Senator
Gerald Nye, |
Folder: Chain Stores and Chain Banks Senator Gerald Nye Papers, |
|
|
|
Letter from H.C. Hansbrough to
Senator Gerald Nye, |
Folder: Chain Banks and Chain Stores Senator Gerald Nye Papers |
|
|
|
“Selling Mrs.
Consumer,” by Mrs. Christine Frederick — a machine-readable transcription. |
Selling Mrs. Consumer, by Mrs. Christine Frederick ... Frederick, Christine McGaffey, 1883- Created/Published |
|
|
|
Interior view of a retail
grocery store in the Hamill Block, |
Western History/Genealogy Department,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photo Analysis
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Amount of Information |
Full
photo analysis of 3–4 photographs. Contains complete factual information (what
you can see) as well as complete inferred information (what you can guess
because of what you see). |
Full
photo analysis of 3–4 photos. Factual and inferred information is nearly
complete. |
Factual
and inferred information is lacking; analysis relies too much on opinion OR
only 2 photographs are analyzed. |
Photo
analysis relies almost entirely on opinion OR fewer than 2 photographs have
been completely analyzed. |
|
Clarity |
Photographs
are extremely well explained, and all assumptions are backed up with good
reasons. |
Photographs
are well explained and all assumptions have supporting reasons. |
Explanations
of the photographs are a little confusing or incomplete. Supporting reasons
are vague. |
Explanations
are confusing and incomplete. Assumptions are not supported. |
|
Organization |
Information
is very organized, brief, and to the point. |
Information
is organized and to the point. |
Information
is organized, but the analysis is too complex or lengthy. |
The
information appears to be disorganized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter Analysis
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Identifies perspective |
Correctly identifies perspective of the three letter writers. |
Correctly identifies the perspectives of two of the three letter writers. |
Correctly identifies the perspectives of one of the three letter writers. |
Recognizes differences in
perspectives but does not correctly identify letter writers. |
|
Identifies supporting arguments |
Finds and lists four consistent arguments. |
Finds and lists three consistent arguments. |
Finds and lists two consistent arguments. |
Finds and lists one consistent argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter Writing
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Content Accuracy |
The letter contains at least 5 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains at least 4 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains at least 3 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains at least 2 accurate facts about the topic. |
|
Position Statement |
The letter contains a clear and concise position statement on the issue. |
The letter contains a position statement but lacks clarity. |
The position statement of the letter is understandable but not concise. |
The position statement of the letter is muddled. |
|
Consistent Argument |
The letter contains at least 3 consistent arguments supporting the position statement. |
The letter contains at least 2 consistent arguments supporting the position statement. |
The letter contains at least 1 consistent argument supporting the position statement. |
The letter contains inconsistent arguments. |
|
Ideas |
Ideas were expressed in a clear and organized fashion. It was easy to figure out what the letter was about. |
Ideas were expressed in a pretty clear manner, but the organization could have been better. |
Ideas were somewhat organized, but were not very clear. It took more than one reading to figure out what the letter was about. |
The letter seemed to be a collection of unrelated sentences. It was difficult to figure out what the letter was about. |
·
Buying Habits of
Small-Town Women Worksheet